Marketo to HubSpot Migration Guide 2026: Zero Data Loss
Complete Marketo to HubSpot migration guide for 2026. Field mapping, workflow rebuild, lead scoring, Salesforc
We provide independent IT consulting — technology strategy, architecture advisory, vendor selection, IT roadmap development, and programme governance — for enterprises that need honest, implementation-grounded advice rather than generic frameworks. Our consultants have delivered the projects they advise on.
From technology strategy and architecture review through vendor evaluation, IT governance, and delivery enablement — every dimension of enterprise IT consulting, delivered by people who have built what they advise on.
Multi-year IT strategies and technology roadmaps aligned to business objectives — current state assessment, capability gap analysis, technology prioritisation, and investment sequencing.
Assess your technology landscape for architecture quality, technical debt, platform fit, and total cost of ownership — findings scored by severity with a prioritised remediation backlog.
Vendor-independent platform evaluation — defining criteria from your requirements, scoring frameworks, vendor demonstrations, and a written selection recommendation with documented rationale.
Ongoing advisory reviewing technology decisions before commitment — identifying architecture risks and technical debt early, ensuring choices align with long-term IT strategy.
TOGAF-aligned architecture governance, ITIL service management processes, technology risk frameworks, and IT portfolio management practices for enterprise technology organisations.
Fractional CIO and CTO advisory — attending leadership meetings, advising on technology investment, representing IT in business planning, and providing senior technology perspective.
Programme governance advisory for large technology programmes — reviewing stage gates, risk registers, delivery methodology, and vendor management before problems escalate.
Advise on transformation programmes — sequencing initiatives, selecting platforms, designing change management, and avoiding common failure patterns from hands-on delivery experience.
Three engagement models matched to different advisory needs — from a focused workshop to an ongoing retainer.
Defined consulting days per month for organisations needing consistent senior technology advisory throughout the year — not just during a specific project.
A discrete fixed-scope engagement — current-state review, gap analysis, findings report, and prioritised roadmap — with defined deliverables and a fixed timeline.
A structured facilitated workshop — bringing your leadership and technology teams to a documented decision or plan within a defined number of days.
We advise on domains where our team has direct implementation experience — not domains we have researched but never built. Hover any domain to explore.
Every engagement starts with evidence gathering — not conclusions. We form views based on what we find, not what we expected before arriving.
Structured interviews with business stakeholders to understand the problems technology is being asked to solve — the business outcomes targeted, budget, timeline, and organisational appetite — before reviewing a single line of architecture.
Review the current technology estate — architecture docs, platform configs, integration maps, team capability assessments, licence inventories, and technical debt backlogs — gathering evidence about actual state, not stakeholder perception.
Analyse the gap between current technology state and the business outcomes being targeted — scoring findings by severity, identifying root causes not symptoms, and building a structured findings report before any recommendations are made.
Develop recommendations based on the evidence — platform assessments, vendor selections, architecture improvements, or investment sequencing — each recommendation supported by the specific findings that motivated it, with trade-offs of alternatives documented.
Deliver the findings report and technology roadmap — written document and leadership presentation — with recommendations prioritised by impact and effort, an investment estimate for each, and a sequencing rationale addressing dependencies and risk.
For clients moving from advisory to execution, provide a clear handover — either managing delivery ourselves or enabling a third-party delivery team with documented architecture decisions and implementation standards from the advisory engagement.
The most expensive IT consulting advice is advice that sounds right but cannot be executed — because the advisor has never delivered what they are recommending.
Every senior consultant has years of hands-on delivery behind their advice. When we advise on a MuleSoft migration, we have delivered one. Strategy grounded in delivery reality produces plans that can actually be executed.
We do not resell platforms. We receive no referral fees. When we recommend Salesforce over HubSpot or MuleSoft over Boomi, the recommendation reflects your requirements — not our commercial relationships.
Every recommendation is documented in writing with the specific evidence that motivated it and the trade-offs of alternatives. We do not provide verbal advice that cannot be revisited or held to account.
We provide advisory and delivery from the same team. No handover gap — the consultants who designed the architecture can lead the delivery programme with zero context rebuild.
Our consulting engagements are delivered by senior practitioners — not junior analysts supervised by a partner who appears in the first and last meetings only.
Technology strategy without a business case is a wish list. Every roadmap includes an investment estimate, expected business outcome, and prioritisation rationale the board can fund.
At Rackwave Technologies, we deliver tailored IT Consulting Services across a wide range of industries. Our industry-focused approach ensures that every solution aligns with specific operational challenges, compliance requirements, and growth objectives—rather than generic technology implementations.
IT systems for real-time tracking and efficient operations.
Explore MoreReal feedback from CIOs, CTOs, and technology leaders who received advice they could actually act on.
What I value most is that Rackwave tells you what they genuinely think — including when the answer is that you are not ready for what you are planning. The advice is honest because the consultants have delivered these programmes and know where they fail. I trust that quality of honesty more than I trust confident advice that has never been tested in production.
Rackwave identified £4.2M in licence waste in our first technology assessment — in 8 weeks. Two previous consultants had told us our technology estate was well-managed. Rackwave had the platform depth to find what the generalist consultants missed. We have used them for our annual technology review ever since.
The vendor selection Rackwave ran was the most rigorous process I have been part of. Defined evaluation criteria from our actual requirements, scored against evidence not marketing materials, and a recommendation document I could show the board with confidence. The platform has been live for 2 years with no regrets.
“Rackwave Technologies has significantly improved our marketing performance while providing reliable cloud services. We’ve been using their solutions for a while now, and the experience has been seamless, scalable, and results-driven.”
David Larry
Founder & CEOEverything you need to know about our IT Consulting services.
The primary difference is practitioner depth. Big Four consultancies employ large teams of analysts and generalist advisors who research technology domains. Rackwave employs practitioners who have delivered the programmes they advise on. We are also genuinely vendor-independent — no platform partnership revenue commitments creating commercial bias.
Cost depends on scope. A focused single-domain assessment typically takes 4 to 8 weeks. A full IT landscape assessment and multi-year roadmap typically takes 8 to 12 weeks. Advisory retainers are structured as defined consulting days per month. We scope every engagement individually and provide a fixed price for fixed-scope engagements.
Yes — we do not resell any platform and receive no referral fees. We have recommended Salesforce in some engagements and HubSpot in others, MuleSoft in some and Azure Integration Services in others — depending on which was right for that client.
Yes — most of our engagements are assessments of current technology. We review existing Salesforce implementations for architecture quality and technical debt, MuleSoft estates for API-led maturity, and integration landscapes for redundancy and risk.
We conduct a genuine evaluation and tell you if the chosen platform fits well, fits with conditions, or does not fit — even if the answer contradicts your existing preference. We are not useful as a firm that produces the recommendation you tell us you want.
Yes. Fractional CIO and CTO advisory for organisations that need senior technology leadership input without the cost of a full-time appointment. Typically includes leadership meetings, technology investment decisions, and board presentation support. Usually 3 to 12 month engagements.
Yes. We design IT governance frameworks informed by TOGAF, ITIL, and COBIT — adapted to what is practical for your organisation's size and maturity rather than mechanically applied. We design governance that actually gets adopted, not governance theatre.
Yes. We provide IT consulting advisory and technology delivery from the same organisation. The consultants who designed the strategy can lead the delivery programme — no handover gap, no risk of a new delivery partner interpreting strategy differently from the intent.
A focused single-domain assessment typically takes 4 to 6 weeks from kick-off to final report. A full enterprise IT landscape assessment covering multiple technology domains typically takes 8 to 12 weeks. We provide a scoped timeline before every engagement begins.
Financial services, retail and ecommerce, healthcare, manufacturing, professional services, technology companies, and the public sector. Technology strategy challenges differ by industry but our advisory methodology is consistent.